How Schwab Can Afford To Eliminate Commissions

crispydoc Uncategorized 1 Comment

Yet another nugget gleaned from reading Mike Piper's Oblivious Investor blog was his link to an explanation describing what I've always regarded as one of the more impressive magic tricks in investing: How can big brokerages afford to eliminate trading fees on stocks and ETFs which have historically been the mainstay of their revenue generation?

The article in question, by Allan Roth, provides a satisfying explanation: the brokerage business has become a loss leader for Schwab's real business, which is profiting from net interest income. That deserves a more in-depth explanation.

According to the Roth article, 61% of Schwab's profits in Q3 2019 derived from net interest. Net interest is what Schwab makes by paying next to nothing in interest on cash sweep accounts, investing the difference in higher yielding investment-grade short-term securities, and keeping the difference. A sweep account is the brokerage account where dividends, transfers, and stock sales automatically go (unless specific arrangements, i.e. automated reinvestment of dividends, demand otherwise).

I decided to examine this phenomenon firsthand by looking at the historical performance of my sweep accounts at Vanguard and Schwab.

The Vanguard Federal Money Market Fund (VMFXX) has a fee-adjusted annual 1 year return of 2.14%.

The Schwab Government Money Fund (SWGXX) distinguishes between investor shares and sweep shares, where the latter has an annual 1 year return of 1.66%.

Apparently, that difference on a scale of billions of dollars in assets is what makes Schwab profitable. Clever.

The article mentioned that Schwab offers a zero-cost robo-advisor platform called the Intelligent Portfolio. When I checked it out, I noticed a unusual disclaimer on the far right side at the top of the page:

We believe cash is a key component of an investment portfolio. Based on your risk profile, a portion of your portfolio is placed in an FDIC-insured deposit at Schwab Bank. Some cash alternatives outside of the program pay a higher yield.

This seems to support the idea that Schwab's popular loss leaders (commission-free trades on stocks and ETFs, free robo-advising service) are intended to draw business away from industry stalwarts like Vanguard while the actual money gets made through interest earned on cash held in a sweep fund.

As clients are likely to be enthusiastic about the free services, few will notice the reduced return on cash in their sweep fund.

At long last, the mystery of eliminating commissions is explained in a manner that makes sense.

Roth expands on a theory of how eliminating commissions, purchasing TD Ameritrade and offering the purchase of fractional shares comprise a three-legged stool strategy to become the dominant brokerage in the business. It makes for a fascinating read - check it out here.

Comments 1

  1. Any brokerage including Vanguard has one goal, to own all the money including all your money and charge you for the privileged. The government plays this same game with your TIRA which is co-owned by you, the government and the brokerage. Banks have always been about shaving points. You think chasing after “lowest fees” on index funds is any different? Index funds what to own all your money. It’s how they get paid.

    If you had 40,000 in today’s dollars it will buy what 20,000 would have bought in 1990. That means with the same 30 year rate of inflation your 40,000 this year will have to be worth 80,000 in 2050 to buy your same ration of milk and cookies. The 10 year is paying 1.62% today. Real inflation is like 2.5%, so the bonds from a real perspective are negative. You are paying 88 bp/yr to park your dough in a 10 year “safe” government investment. The government is eating your milk and cookies. Yet everyone is flipped out about paying 30 bp to an AUM to help you optimize or maybe eliminate your 88 bp risk!

    Gotta love the DIY’s, why would any dumbass pay 33 bp when you can hose up your future for free? You can bet Vanguard and Schwab in 30 years will be cash flow positive for each and every one of those 30 years. You (not you in particular but you as the “we” of the narrative) OTOH your return is unclear. It’s a roll of the bones.

    I use “free trades” at FIDO in a Roth account I am trading. I can trade the hell out of the thing and not incur taxes or commissions but I’m not fooling myself that it’s free, but it is a lot of fun. I’ll pay for the fun. Bought me some cocoa coffee wood hogs and energy low, rode those to gains and sold them out. You buy commodities when inflation is accelerating. Inflation is now decelerating so I’m buying bonds gold gold miners silver miners and utilities. Beats hell out of watching CNBC and those dweebs with the pony tails. Today Dow is down 14bp my Roth is up 30 bp, inflation is falling and the dollar is strengthening. What is it Ice Cube say?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.